'Safe Carry Protection Act' Bill Passes House
A Georgia bill that would loosen restrictions on where firearms could be carried is a step closer to law.
Peachtree Corners are you in favor of the new proposed HB 512 that passed the House this week? It reportedly would allow guns in churches and unsecured government buildings.
HB 512, also known as the Safe Carry Protection Act, passed the Georgia House on Thursday (March 7), by a vote of 117-56. It was the last day in the 2013 General Assembly session that the bill could "cross over" to the Senate.
The bill, among other things, would allow guns on college campuses, which the University System of Georgia has lobbied against.
Also, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, it would allow guns in churches, unsecured government buildings and courthouses, and would allow school boards to arm administrators in schools.
There are nine days left in the legislative session for the Senate to act.
-- Do you think the Safe Carry Protection Act should become law? Use comment box below to respond.
Keep up with Peachtree Corners news - click here to sign up for the free Peachtree Corners Patch newsletter delivered to your email or smartphone every day.
Doug Heckman
3:36 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Craziness !!! Now we will see guns in churches and on campuses ...what a shame...what does it say about our society?....that the terrorists and mentally unstable have won.....to my many conservative friends, when you elect these far-right activists, this is what you get....
I saw that Nelson and Kennesaw Georgia now have laws that everyone must own a firearm.....maybe we can do the same thing here in Peachtree Corners.
To the silent and sensible majority out there - wake up....yes there are plenty of issues and excesses on the left/center, but the far right will do much more damage.
Al Roteh
8:02 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Tens of thousands of Georgia citizens carry concealed weapons. How many of those have you seen? How many do you expect to see in a Church? You will be glad to see one if a crazed gunman enters your Church. It might just save your and your families life.
Jimmy
11:31 am on Monday, March 11, 2013
Kennesaw has had its mandatory gun ownership law since 1982, and they have 30 yrs of reduced crime statistics to go with it...lowest crime rate in Cobb County too...maybe we could do the same thing in Peachtree Corners. Best idea you've had in a while Doug!
Richard T
7:58 am on Friday, March 15, 2013
Doug, You may not have heard this before, but guns don't kill people, people kill people. Why don't you wake up your left-wing friends and ask them why they are so opposed to personal accountability, whether its in school promotions, "affirmative action" OR crime? You can't put a gun in jail, but people who use them for illegal purposes should be put UNDER the jail!! HOLD CRIMINALS ACCOUNTABLE AND PUNISH THEM IN A WAY THAT FITS THEIR CRIME, if for no other reason, then simply out of respect for their victims, some of whom had their rights permanently violated by the criminal!!
Doug Heckman
8:28 am on Friday, March 15, 2013
Thanks to each of you for your thoughtful responses. I suppose we can agree to disagree.
The fact is that the USA has the highest rate of suicide and homicide in the world. Most of it is done by guns. We can either blame all kinds of things, or choose to lower the rate. The best way to do that is through limited gun control (ask all the other developed nations on earth). it works. Oh, and we can still responsibly own and carry forearms - just like they did 200 years ago. Of course, back then they carried 30 pound, one shot muskets. The world has changed and maybe we should too.
Richard T
3:11 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
We ARE the most developed nation. . . I choose not to control guns. I choose to control mental health issues, and silly little old fashioned ideas like letting the punishment fit the crime. I see nothing to loise and everything to gain by making prisons unpleasant places used to modify unacceptable behavior. If you outlaw guns, GUESS WHO WILL HAVE GUNS???
Jimmy
5:54 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
200 years ago the first amendment was passed to protect your right to free speech, among other things...back then that was limited to actual speech, handwritten letters, typeset newspapers and smoke signals. Using your logic, you should not be allowed to have free speech over the radio, on the tv or on the internet because they werent in use back then?
K Wade
5:12 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
I commend you for trying, Doug. I think you may have momentarily forgotten where you are, though. I hope it will change someday, but I suspect I will be gone before it does.
Jimmy
6:01 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Dont worry K...the odds are better that you will die slipping and falling in your own bathtub, than from a legally owned and operated gun...
Nonetheless, I hope that you live a long and prosperous life and never see the change you hope for...
K Wade
5:14 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
@Richard T You certainly have a grasp on talking points. All you do is repeat them. Your all-cap sentences do nothing but irritate, though. When you do that, the sentiments you are typing become moot. All people see is the obnoxious caps.
K Wade
8:40 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
@Jimmy Who said I was worried about dying from a gun? Did I say that? What I hope to see change is the mentality of those who think having a gun is somehow equated to being "free".
I am a gun owner. I have no problem with guns. I don't even need a law that says if I can carry it or not. If I choose to carry it, I will. I also won't whine about others expressing their feelings about gun ownership.
My problem isn't with the guns. It's the seemingly increasing population of idiots who think they need a gun to breath that bothers me.
Jimmy
10:38 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Your response to Doug above left that impression...apologies for the misunderstanding.
Robert J. Nebel
5:19 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
This is an interesting, informative thread with @Doug challenging his conservative friends. So, now in the aftermath of the Assault Weapons Ban failure, what possible solutions ought to be on the table with this issue? With this world's advanced technology, should there be a centralized background check system in place where all weapons are sold including gun shows? Should those same records be tied in with medical/mental health care records? Certainly, civil libertarians/privacy-rights advocates would have a problem with such a system, but would the majority of U.S. citizens feel more comfortable with an enhanced electronic background check system and should that idea be put to a vote? @Richard T brings up a good point about how mental health care issues are related to the central debate on gun control.